Citation: | NING Jiangfeng, LI Maolin, CUI Rui, YAO Wei, SHI Jia, LI Ruijie. Effect of Fe3+ and Sodium Silicate As Combination Inhibitors on Flotation Separation of Fluorite and Calcite[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020, 40(6): 64-70. DOI: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2020.06.010 |
The separation of fluorite and calcite is difficult, because there are Ca2+ active sites on the surface of fluorite and calcite, and the surface properties of the two minerals are similar. Through single mineral flotation test, adsorption amount measurement, Zeta potential measurement and chemical calculation of flotation solution, Fe3+ was introduced and mixed with sodium silicate to study the effect of the combined inhibitor on flotation separation of fluorite and calcite and its mechanism. Flotation test results show that, Fe- sodium silicate selectively inhibits the flotation of calcite compared with sodium silicate, and realizes the separation of the two minerals. The mechanism test results show that the Fe- sodium silicate polymer formed by Fe2+ and sodium silicate in solution and the hydrolyzed component Si(OH)4 have strong adsorption on the surface of calcite, which hinders the further adsorption of sodium oleate and thus inhibits the flotation of calcite.
[1] |
ZHANG C, SUN W, HU Y, et al. Investigation of two-stage depressing by using hydrophilic polymer to improve the process of fluorite flotation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193(20): 228-235. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618313854
|
[2] |
王文利, 白志民. 中国萤石资源及产业发展现状[J]. 金属矿山, 2014(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8550.2014.03.001
|
[3] |
曹钊, 屈奇奇, 曹永丹, 等. 不同类型萤石矿浮选工艺技术现状与进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2017(7): 8-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1250.2017.07.002
|
[4] |
邓湘湘, 廖德华. 萤石选矿技术研究现状[J]. 怀化学院学报, 2015, 34(11): 100-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HUAI201511025.htm
|
[5] |
ZENG X, XU L, TIAN J, et al. Effect of a CA depressant on flotation separation of celestite from fluorite and calcite using SDS as a collector[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2017, 111: 201-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.06.019
|
[6] |
FA K, NGUYEN A V, MILLER J D. Interaction of calcium dioleate collector colloids with calcite and fluorite surfaces as revealed by AFM force measurements and molecular dynamics simulation[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2006, 81(3): 166-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2006.08.006
|
[7] |
XU L, WU H, DONG F, et al. Flotation and adsorption of mixed cationic/anionic collectors on muscovite mica[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2013, 41: 41-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.015
|
[8] |
YANG B, WANG D, WANG T, et al. Effect of Cu2+ and Fe3+ on the depression of molybdenite in flotation[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2019, 130: 101-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.10.012
|
[9] |
张波, 李解, 张雪峰, 等. Cu2+, Fe3+对萤石浮选的活化作用机制[J]. 稀有金属, 2016, 40(9): 963-968. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXJS201609017.htm
|
[10] |
DENG R, YANG X, HU Y, et al. Effect of Fe(Ⅱ) as assistant depressant on flotation separation of scheelite from calcite[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 118: 133-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.12.017
|
[11] |
FENG B, GUO W, XU H G, et al. The combined effect of lead ion and sodium silicate in the flotation separation of scheelite from calcite[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2017, 52(3): 567-573. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2016.1260590
|
[12] |
王淀佐, 胡岳华. 浮选溶液化学[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1988: 336-337.
|
[13] |
DONG L Y, JIAO F, QIN W Q, et al. Effect of acidified water glass on the flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using mixed cationic/anionic collectors[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 444: 747-756. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.097
|
[14] |
FENG B, LUO X P, WANG J Q, et al. The flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using acidified sodium silicate as depressant[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 80: 45-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.017
|
[15] |
杨晓峰. 白钨矿与含钙脉石分离抑制剂的遴选及作用机理研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2015.
|
[16] |
WEI Z, HU Y H, HAN H S, et al. Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite using Al-Na2SiO3 polymer as depressant and Pb-BHA complexes as collector[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 120: 29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.036
|
1. |
宁江峰,曾建红,徐寒冰,耿亮,崔瑞,杨哲辉. Fe~(3+)对浮钨尾矿中受抑萤石的活化作用及其与方解石浮选分离的影响. 矿产保护与利用. 2024(02): 74-79 .
![]() | |
2. |
张丹仙,亢建华,黄红军,祝雯霞,王若林. 萤石资源开发利用现状与战略意义. 过程工程学报. 2023(01): 1-14 .
![]() | |
3. |
文俊,赵伟,李复勇,竹合林,张航飞,张金元. 川西南马边地区永红萤石矿床地质特征、成因类型及其开发利用价值. 矿产综合利用. 2023(01): 1-9+15 .
![]() | |
4. |
熊立,袁承浪,方霖. 新疆某萤石选矿试验研究. 中国矿山工程. 2023(01): 41-46 .
![]() | |
5. |
王超,朱一民,刘杰,韩跃新. 不同模数水玻璃对白钨矿浮选行为的影响. 中国矿业大学学报. 2023(02): 364-371 .
![]() | |
6. |
李凤久,孔亚然,贾清梅. 某萤石矿选矿实验研究. 矿产综合利用. 2023(02): 81-86+123 .
![]() | |
7. |
许洪峰,牛艳萍. 嫩江市三矿沟矿区矽卡岩型含金、银氧化铜矿石硫化浮选试验研究. 中国矿业. 2023(05): 131-137 .
![]() | |
8. |
赵荣,宋宝旭,普久然,吴杰,陈明波,周永星. 云南卡房铜钨浮选尾矿回收萤石. 矿产综合利用. 2023(05): 135-141 .
![]() | |
9. |
熊浩,刘建,秦晓艳,白旭,赖浩. 改性水玻璃抑制剂研究进展. 矿产保护与利用. 2023(05): 138-145 .
![]() | |
10. |
王超,朱一民,刘杰,张淑敏,谢瑞琦. 组合抑制剂在白钨矿与含钙脉石浮选分离中的作用及机理. 金属矿山. 2022(03): 129-136 .
![]() | |
11. |
吕良,曹飞,王守敬,岳铁兵,郭珍旭. 豫西某石英型萤石矿浮选工艺研究. 矿产综合利用. 2022(02): 92-99 .
![]() | |
12. |
李育彪,杨旭. 我国萤石资源及选矿技术进展. 矿产保护与利用. 2022(02): 49-58 .
![]() | |
13. |
吴迪,王洪岭,孟庆波,高玉德,杨晓文,张晓刚. 内蒙古某多金属矿尾矿回收萤石实验研究. 矿产综合利用. 2022(06): 155-158+166 .
![]() | |
14. |
丁伟丽,任玲玲,王唸,郑培利,朱怀睿. 组合抑制剂对萤石与方解石浮选行为研究. 河南化工. 2022(12): 25-28 .
![]() | |
15. |
王鹏,曹永丹,王介良,张艳清,曹钊. 辛基羟肟酸与硅酸钠对氟碳铈矿和萤石的浮选效果及量化计算. 中国有色金属学报. 2022(12): 3853-3861 .
![]() | |
16. |
陈伟,张志豪,陈彤,王亮,卜显忠. 锌浸出渣浮选回收银的试验研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2021(12): 149-153 .
![]() | |
17. |
张建文,马崇振,梁汉,廖乾,黄礼龙,颜娜. 磨矿细度对湖南某方解石矿加工技术性能的影响研究. 矿产综合利用. 2021(06): 81-84 .
![]() |