压渣爆破排间延时对爆堆块度的影响研究

Effect of Inter−row Delay on Fragmentation in Buffer Blasting

  • 摘要: 压渣爆破中排间延时的合理选取直接影响爆堆块度分布及大块率。基于应力波传播理论与爆生气体延长效应,以某露天硫铁矿深孔台阶压渣爆破为工程背景,在孔间延期时间固定为42  ms的前提下,分别设置100 、125 、150、175  ms 4种排间延期时间方案,开展现场爆破对比试验。采用无人机倾斜摄影与WipFrag图像分析技术获取爆堆块度分布,并结合爆破振动监测,系统分析排间延期时间对块度及大块率的影响规律。结果表明:随排间延期时间增加,大块率呈先降低后升高的趋势;当排间延期时间为150  ms时,大块率降至最低值8.3%,破碎效果最佳。过短延期时间(100  ms)导致应力波叠加不充分、能量分布不均,过长延期时间(175  ms)削弱排间协同破碎效应,二者均不利于岩石破碎。爆破振动监测显示,各方案振动速度均远低于《爆破安全规程》(GB 6722—2014)安全限值,延期时间调整未对周边环境产生显著振动影响。研究结果可为同类压渣爆破工程提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The appropriate selection of inter−row delay time in buffer blasting directly affects the fragmentation distribution and boulder percentage of the muck pile. Based on the stress wave propagation theory and the prolonged action of detonation gas, this study conducted comparative field blasting tests in the context of deep−hole bench buffer blasting at an open−pit pyrite mine. With a fixed inter−hole delay time of 42 ms, four inter−row delay time schemes (100, 125, 150, 175 ms) were designed. Fragmentation distributions of the muck piles were acquired using UAV oblique photogrammetry combined with WipFrag image analysis, supplemented by blasting vibration monitoring, to systematically investigate the influence of inter−row delay time on fragmentation and boulder percentage. The results indicate that, with increasing inter−row delay time, the boulder percentage first decreases and then increases. At an inter−row delay time of 150 ms, the boulder percentage reaches its minimum value of 8.3%, indicating the optimal fragmentation effect. An excessively short delay time (100 ms) results in insufficient superposition of stress waves and uneven energy distribution, whereas an excessively long delay time (175 ms) weakens the inter−row synergistic fragmentation effect; both conditions are detrimental to rock fragmentation. Blasting vibration monitoring demonstrates that the vibration velocities for all schemes are substantially below the safety limits specified in the Safety Regulations for Blasting (GB 6722—2014), indicating that adjustments to the delay time do not produce significant vibration impacts on the surrounding environment. The optimal inter−row delay time of 150 ms identified in this study can serve as a reference for similar buffer blasting projects.

     

/

返回文章
返回